I am back from a well deserved Holiday in Florida with my 2 sisters and most of the kids (2 were missing because of other commitments).
There was no Internet access the whole time we were there.
Of course, we did sneak in a little live poker one night. We played a couple of $5 buy in mini tourny’s. I got second in both and got my money back plus a little.
One of the guys playing was fairly good (too aggressive with crap cards) and my Nephew who is pretty good just didn’t get any cards.
As with most home games, there was a lot of Monkey play and you have to be careful not to get sucked out but all in all, it was fun.
I will work on posting some pics of the alligators, shrimp boil, rope swing, and other festivities when I get some time and maybe Paulies help. I have to go to Chicago for a couple of days on business. If I stay over down there. I will try to get on Skype.
I also have a Hot Water Heater incident I will discuss in more detail later.
I have been reading the blogs lately about sites, rewarding Monkey play, etc.
I’ll tell ya, I have a hard time believing a Poker site is going to reward stupid play just to keep games moving or because you just took money from their site.
I realize it is hard to accept and logically reason why people are winning hands when you go in with the best but maybe it has a lot to do with perspective.
I have not formulated all of my thoughts on this yet but one of the analogies I think of is like this.
Lets say you are interested in buying a new type of car. Prior to considering the type of car you want, you don’t remember seeing any in your area. Then, once you decide on the type of car you want, you realize there are a lot more cars in your area that you never noticed before. You don’t conscientiously think about it but you notice them more anyway.
Maybe this is type of thinking is part of what everyone is experiencing. Everyone is now focused either conscientiously or sub conscientiously on the “bad beat” sceniario at a particular site.
How many times prior to the “bad beat” did you win when you should have? Maybe you have expereinced “bad beats” at other sites but haven’t noticed as much.
This, of course, does not apply to not getting cards as in Lippy’s case. Not getting cards is just not getting cards.
I just have a hard time believing that out of the thousands of players that play there, they picked out Lippy, decided he needed to loose, and adjusted the RNG just so HE didn’t get cards AND can’t win like the others once in a while with a 1 or 2 outer.
See what I mean?
As far as messing with the RNG, I go back to the age old question of Why? Why would a site risk everything to take a few $2, $5, SNG’s from someone that “should have” won and give it to someone who shouldn’t have won? Either way, they are paying out. What would be the benefit?
It is a very interesting topic.
Right now, I have to go and get ready for my trip.
Give me your thoughts and comments.
Thanks,